Juho Laatu wrote:
On 9.7.2011, at 14.23, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
Juho Laatu wrote:
After some recent discussions and thoughts around two-party
systems I thought it would be interesting to discuss two-party
systems also in a more positive spirit. The assumption is thus
that we want the
Jameson Quinn wrote:
2011/7/8 Warren Smith warren@gmail.com mailto:warren@gmail.com
Sorry, as Jameson pointed out, he has invented a voting method he
calls AT-TV
which (he claims)
1. obeys a proportional representation theorem
Yes. It's instructive to see what PR
Toby Pereira wrote:
Is this just the Instant Run-off version of STV that you're talking
about that pays no attention to who you ranked below top? Also your
example here - http://rangevoting.org/PRcond.html - would that be
resolved under any form of STV in existence?
The DPC says that at
First I'll try to clarify the definitions a bit. It is so obvious what a
two-party system is, but when I think more carefully it is not that clear.
Two-party system:
- has a single-party government
- one of the two major parties forms the government and the other one forms
(the main part of)
