All current forms of party list proportional representation have each voter
cast a vote for a single party. I say this is inadequate since a small party
can be eliminated and hence denied any representation (this is particularly
relevant if the legislature has a threshold). However, votes for a par
Greg Nisbet > Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 10:25 PM
> All current forms of party list proportional representation
> have each voter cast a vote for a single party. I say this is
> inadequate since a small party can be eliminated and hence
> denied any representation (this is particularly rel
Glad to see thinking, though we part company on some details.
On Aug 13, 2011, at 5:25 PM, Greg Nisbet wrote:
All current forms of party list proportional representation have
each voter cast a vote for a single party. I say this is inadequate
since a small party can be eliminated and hence d
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Dave Ketchum wrote:
> Glad to see thinking, though we part company on some details.
>
>
> On Aug 13, 2011, at 5:25 PM, Greg Nisbet wrote:
>
> All current forms of party list proportional representation have each
>> voter cast a vote for a single party. I say this
Thanks for the welcome Abd, and thanks for answering my question.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> Well, take a look around Wikiversity. If you are interested,
> participate.
>
> Or just watch, or just wait. As your proxy, I'll contact you if I
> think your participation might be needed in something.
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 00:32:14 +0100
> From: "James Gilmour"
> To:
> Subject: Re: [EM] Preferential Party List Method Proposal
> Message-ID: <1E8F1DC34EB34C50A49239C7C1BA6CCB@u2amd>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Greg Nisbet > Sent: Saturday, August 13,
