Hi Mike,
Personally I don't think anyone is "wronged" in the MMPO example.
I just don't think voters would accept it, and it would be difficult
to advocate. People will ask how the outcome can possibly make sense
and I don't think you can reassure them by asking who's wronged.
The issue isn't rea
Hi Jameson,
De : Jameson Quinn
>À : Kevin Venzke
>Cc : election-methods
>Envoyé le : Mercredi 29 février 2012 15h35
>Objet : Re: [EM] An interesting scenario (spoilers, utility)
>
>
>This is indeed an interesting scenario. Something is particularly weak about
>those B>C preferences. It coul
2012/2/29 Jameson Quinn
>
>> Currently the tiny state of Rhode Island is so frustrated by what goes on
>> in its state legislature that it is ripe for election-method reform. That
>> state is so small that it is more "local" than the Los Angeles area.
>>
>
> By the way, does anyone on the list h
>
>
> Currently the tiny state of Rhode Island is so frustrated by what goes on
> in its state legislature that it is ripe for election-method reform. That
> state is so small that it is more "local" than the Los Angeles area.
>
By the way, does anyone on the list have any news at all about the R
2012/2/29 MIKE OSSIPOFF
>
> Jameson:
>
> You wrote:
>
> Still, again I have to ask you, Mike: where's SODA? You were right earlier
> that SODA fails FBC. But there are three mitigating factors.
>
> 1) Failure would be very rare; I hope to be able to be more precise about
> this in the near future
Jameson:
You wrote:
Still, again I have to ask you, Mike: where's SODA?
You were right earlier that SODA fails FBC. But there are three
mitigating factors.
1) Failure would be very rare; I hope to be able to be more precise about this
in the near future.
[endquote]
I told you why that do
On 02/26/2012 06:25 PM, Richard Fobes wrote:
On 2/24/2012 1:01 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
On 02/23/2012 11:24 PM, Richard Fobes wrote:
Kristofer Munsterhjelm asks: "... why do you propose rules that would
make it harder for third parties to grow?" ...
What I promote is VoteFair ranking.
On 02/20/2012 03:34 AM, Richard Fobes wrote:
On 2/19/2012 1:24 AM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
> On 02/19/2012 06:18 AM, Richard Fobes wrote:
>> ...
>> More specifically, European politicians seem to be as clueless as U.S.
>> politicians about what is needed to "create jobs" and restore
wid
This is indeed an interesting scenario. Something is particularly weak
about those B>C preferences. It could be one of two things:
1) Maybe you're using some kind of trimmed or decaying utility function,
where the difference between a candidate who's 2/3 units away and one who's
1 unit away is neg
Instructions for how to make a method look bad:
Contrive an example in which the main contending candidates barely differ
by the method's own standard, but in which those candidates differ humungously
and outrageously
by some other standard. In order to achieve the latter condition as strongly a
Hello,
I have been adding some code to help investigate cases where Approval
shows greater "perception of spoiler" than, say, IRV. To make the
scenarios easier to visualize I just allocated six voting factions
proportionately along 1D, positions ranging from -1 to 1.
I found an interesting cas
11 matches
Mail list logo
