>> In what sense doesn't it "fly well"? What does that mean?
>
> I just meant that it is a waste of effort and energy to have "fake"
> candidates that appear as they >could be elected, but they can't, or whose
> presence may make the "natural" winner not win.
Again, you're quite right. We do hav
On 20.9.2012, at 8.20, Michael Ossipoff wrote:
> You said:
>
> The idea that there are third candidates but that are never elected,
> and that can act as spoilers does not fly very well.
>
> [endquote]
>
> In what sense doesn't it "fly well"? What does that mean?
I just meant that it is a was
