The ANTI-Democracy minority rule gerrymander CRISIS in the U.S.A. is N-O-W.
Advanced head to head Condorcet math for legislative body elections will
have to wait a bit due to the LOW-LOW-LOW math in the U.S.A. politics.
Remember every soul who got killed/injured fighting the DEVIL monarchs/
oli
On 2/17/2013 12:17 AM, Peter Zbornik wrote:
2013/2/16 Kristofer Munsterhjelm:
On 02/14/2013 07:07 PM, Richard Fobes wrote:
...
... as in
the top-down method of Otten?
...
... perhaps Peter meant this one?
http://www.votingmatters.org.uk/ISSUE13/P3.HTM
yes, that's the method I was thinking
I'm not saying that the hybrids meet Later-No-Harm (LNHa), but they meet
the Chicken Dilemma Criterion (CD), and that's good enough to retain IRV's
strategy-free-ness in a mutual majority..
Because the hybrids meet MMC, the members of a mutual majority can be
assured that, by merely ranking sincer
I don't know when, but James Green-Armytage wrote an interesting article on
hybrids between IRV and Condorcet.
It's at:
http://econ.ucsb.edu/~armytage/hybrids.pdf
I mention it because it says (among other things) basically what I've been
saying:
James says that IRV is remarkably strategy-free.
2013/2/16 Kristofer Munsterhjelm :
> On 02/14/2013 07:07 PM, Richard Fobes wrote:
>
>>> ... as in
>>> the top-down method of Otten?
>>
>>
>> I did not find any information about the "top-down method of Otten." If
>> you send me a link to a place that describes it, then I can answer this
>> part of
