Re: [EM] "Top 2+1 Approval" primaries

2013/7/26 Peter Gustafsson > from: jameson.qu...@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:54:09 -0600 > To: election-methods@lists.electorama.com; > electionscie...@googlegroups.com > Subject: [EM] "Top 2+1 Approval" primaries > Here's a simple proposal for a top-two-like mechanism for primaries, >

Re: [EM] "Top 2+1 Approval" primaries

Jameson: I am not a Quora member, and I am not about to sign up. That said, if you want to use the text and answer it there, do go ahead. Yours, Peter Gustafsson > From: jameson.qu...@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 05:09:58 -0600 > Subject: Re: [EM] "Top

Re: [EM] [CES #9172] An idiosyncratic 4-D chart of voting system quality

2013/7/26 Clay Shentrup > On Friday, July 26, 2013 7:47:41 AM UTC-7, Bruce R. Gilson wrote: > >> To me, voter satisfaction also includes some other elements: especially, >> as we've debated, the question of "could I have done better by voting >> differently?" And of course, Approval, as I've poin

[EM] An idiosyncratic 4-D chart of voting system quality

An idiosyncratic 4-D chart of voting system quality by Jameson Quinn on Game Theory, Politics, and Meta In general, while I'm happy to reply to comments on this material here, I'd prefer have the conversation via Qu

Re: [EM] "Top 2+1 Approval" primaries

from: jameson.qu...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:54:09 -0600 To: election-methods@lists.electorama.com; electionscie...@googlegroups.com Subject: [EM] "Top 2+1 Approval" primaries Here's a simple proposal for a top-two-like mechanism for primaries, copied from an answer of mine on Quora: Th