On 09/04/2013 04:21 AM, Fred Gohlke wrote:
* It might be well to select a larger number initially and include an
opt-out provision so those with no interest in politics can remove
themselves from the process.
That's a good point. The "electoral" commission could choose a larger
number than th
Michael Allan said it best:
"The individual votes are brought together to make a result,
but the individual voters are not brought together as such
to make a decision; therefore no valid decision can be
extracted from the result."
> Vidar Wahlberg wrote:
> Giving the electors balanced
Thank you, very much, Mike.
I didn't realize they had changed it.
I'm keeping the new address and appreciate your help.
Fred
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
Vidar Wahlberg said:
> ... I would like to see a system where electors are encouraged to
> gain insight and reflected views, and vote thereafter.
Me too. I spend much of my time chasing such a system (as do Abd and
Fred, I believe). Please share what you find.
> ... Giving the electors balanced
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 12:14:36AM +0200, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
> If you're electing just one seat, then C should win; anything else
> would be unfair to a majority. But if you're picking two, then if
> you give the first seat to C, giving the second to L will bias the
> assembly to L and g
