robert bristow-johnson wrote:
i was looking for Kristofer's posts to EM and came across this, i may
have missed it:
On Jun 22, 2011, at 5:30 AM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
I've mentioned it before, but I think Condorcet enjoys an additional
advantage here. Say there's a CW and he is not
On 8.7.2011, at 11.00, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
But now consider a parallel universe where the CW always won (and these
victories were significant, i.e. people really preferred the CW to the rest).
Say Montroll won. Then Kiss-supporters and Wright-supporters might try to
unite in the
Juho Laatu wrote:
On 8.7.2011, at 11.00, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
But now consider a parallel universe where the CW always won (and
these victories were significant, i.e. people really preferred the
CW to the rest). Say Montroll won. Then Kiss-supporters and
Wright-supporters might try to
Some more observations.
Party officials and representatives have more weight in decision making than
regular voters. The opinions of regular supporters of party A could be
ACentristB, but the opinions of people whose future and career are tied to
the party have more ACentristB orientation.
i was looking for Kristofer's posts to EM and came across this, i may
have missed it:
On Jun 22, 2011, at 5:30 AM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
robert bristow-johnson wrote:
On Jun 21, 2011, at 7:56 AM, Markus Schulze wrote:
Hallo,
Eric Maskin, a Nobel laureate, is currently very
robert bristow-johnson wrote:
On Jun 21, 2011, at 7:56 AM, Markus Schulze wrote:
Hallo,
Eric Maskin, a Nobel laureate, is currently very
active in promoting the Black method.
and we've all been groping for a name for this primary voting criteria
that is not this non-American, Frenchie,
