On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:26 PM, wrote:
>
> > Forrest,
> >
> > I'm trying to make sure I understand exactly what the "Ultimate
> > Lottery"methods are.
> >
> > So the "Ultimate Lottery" singlewinner method is:
> >
> > 1. Voters submit homogeneous functions of p1,p2,...,pn
> > 2. Choose the config
- Original Message -
From: Andy Jennings
Date: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 2:02 pm
Subject: Re: [EM] Compromise allocation of fair share
To: fsimm...@pcc.edu
Cc: election-methods@lists.electorama.com
> Forrest,
>
> I'm trying to make sure I understand exactly what the "
; From: Andy Jennings
> Date: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 7:14 am
> Subject: Re: [EM] Compromise allocation of fair share
> To: fsimm...@pcc.edu
> Cc: election-methods@lists.electorama.com
>
> > Forrest,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:39 PM, wrote:
> >
> > &
- Original Message -
From: Andy Jennings
Date: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 7:14 am
Subject: Re: [EM] Compromise allocation of fair share
To: fsimm...@pcc.edu
Cc: election-methods@lists.electorama.com
> Forrest,
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:39 PM, wrote:
>
> > I would
Forrest,
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:39 PM, wrote:
> I would like to modify my proposal for a new kind of list PR method.
>
> 1. Voters submit ballots indicating their favorite parties. These ballots
> are used to find the standard list PR allocation of N seats by some standard
> method. We cal
I would like to modify my proposal for a new kind of list PR method.
1. Voters submit ballots indicating their favorite parties. These ballots are
used to find the standard list PR allocation of N seats by some standard
method. We call this allocation the Fallback allocation.
2. All intere
How to use your homogeneous degree one function ballot to control the
distribution of your share of the
allocation (whether of number of seats or probability):
1. As proved in the last post, if you want 100% to go to P1, then vote f(p)=p1.
2. If you want 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% , respectively
The purpose of this message is to show the "proportionality" of allocation when
it is determined by maximizing the product of ballots in the form of functions
that are homogeneous of degree one in the proportion vector p.
Let p = (p1, p2, ...) represent the proportion vector for allocation of sea
I just changed the thread name to reflect the current thrust more accurately.
Here's my best elaboration of the compromise allocation idea in the Party list
PR setting:
1. Anybody and everybody (corporations included, since the supreme court wants
it that way) can nominate seat
allocations to
