I've revised the paragraph that Fred Gohlke was offended by. Thanks
Fred for giving feedback that justified improving some wording that I
didn't like either.
- New version -
Most of us regard the adoption of our supported methods as a small step
toward increasing the fairness of
Richard,
re: Nothing in this statement should be interpreted to imply
that we believe that election-method reform is the only area
of existing political systems that currently needs reform.
In fact, most of us also support other reforms such as
broader
On 9/7/2011 3:30 PM, Fred Gohlke wrote:
Richard,
re: Nothing in this statement should be interpreted to imply
that we believe that election-method reform is the only area
of existing political systems that currently needs reform.
In fact, most of us also support other reforms such as
broader
On 9/5/2011 1:27 PM, Fred Gohlke wrote:
Good Afternoon, Richard
I've just spent the last couple of hours going over the material at
www.NegotiationTool.com and www.votefair.org. I enjoyed my visit.
re: As for promoting direct public participation in the
political process, first we have to
Good Afternoon, Richard
I've just spent the last couple of hours going over the material at
www.NegotiationTool.com and www.votefair.org. I enjoyed my visit.
re: As for promoting direct public participation in the
political process, first we have to develop election-
method 'tools'
