On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Aaron Armitage
wrote:
> I've considered the question myself, although I've never described my
> ideas publicly. Now's as good an opportunity as any.
>
> I came at it from the opposite direction, so to speak; trying to graft
> lists onto STV to make it scalable, rat
On May 23, 2010, at 10:40 PM, Aaron Armitage wrote:
I've considered the question myself, although I've never described my
ideas publicly. Now's as good an opportunity as any.
I came at it from the opposite direction, so to speak; trying to graft
lists onto STV to make it scalable, rather than a
Aaron Armitage wrote:
I've considered the question myself, although I've never described my
ideas publicly. Now's as good an opportunity as any.
[snip]
The first way of adding lists to STV is simple: you list your candidates,
and last you put a list, which fills out the rest of your preferenc
I've considered the question myself, although I've never described my
ideas publicly. Now's as good an opportunity as any.
I came at it from the opposite direction, so to speak; trying to graft
lists onto STV to make it scalable, rather than adding candidate rankings
to a list system. The basic id
On May 22, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
Juho wrote:
Simple question, simple answer. Use lists between parties (or other
groupings) and candidate ranking within them. Open lists try to
implement proportionality within the lists in one quite primitive
way. Use of candidate
Juho wrote:
Simple question, simple answer. Use lists between parties (or other
groupings) and candidate ranking within them. Open lists try to
implement proportionality within the lists in one quite primitive way.
Use of candidate ranking within the parties allows us to offer also
proper part
On May 22, 2010, at 2:15 AM, Raph Frank wrote:
The ballot layout issues would still be there. If the voter is to be
able to rank all candidates, then you need to have each candidate's
name on the ballot.
Yes, the candidates have to be listed somewhere. Ballots could be
shorter if there woul
The ballot layout issues would still be there. If the voter is to be
able to rank all candidates, then you need to have each candidate's
name on the ballot.
It would still save time, since you could sort the ballots into piles
for each party. Also, coalition negotiations could start once the
par
Simple question, simple answer. Use lists between parties (or other
groupings) and candidate ranking within them. Open lists try to
implement proportionality within the lists in one quite primitive way.
Use of candidate ranking within the parties allows us to offer also
proper party interna
