Dave Ketchum wrote:
> It matters for most, if not all, methods, including Plurality.
> Individually voters can rarely do anything, collectively they are the
> result producers - without any necessity for contact amongst themselves.
Like magic? I agree that (a) the result is a collective of vot
Thanks Juho!
It matters for most, if not all, methods, including Plurality.
Individually voters can rarely do anything, collectively they are the
result producers - without any necessity for contact amongst themselves.
Dave Ketchum
On Jun 18, 2009, at 7:22 AM, Juho Laatu wrote:
--- On
--- On Thu, 18/6/09, Michael Allan wrote:
> > Juho Laatu wrote:
> > > Do you mean that one individual vote
> > > practically never changes the result
> > > of a large election?
> > >
> > > One can see this from two viewpoints.
> > > 1) can I change the result
> > > 2) can I and similar minded pe
> Juho Laatu wrote:
> > Do you mean that one individual vote
> > practically never changes the result
> > of a large election?
> >
> > One can see this from two viewpoints.
> > 1) can I change the result
> > 2) can I and similar minded people
> > together change the result
Raph Frank wrote:
> W
