Re: [EM] Interactive Representation

2011-11-06 Thread Juho Laatu
With two representatives per district this is a pretty good method, if we want a two-party system and if we accept the idea of having representatives with different weights. Spoiler and gerrymandering related problems are greatly reduced, and the method allows also third parties to grow. With

Re: [EM] Interactive Representation

2011-11-06 Thread capologist
On Nov 5, 2011, at 11:35 PM, election-methods-requ...@lists.electorama.com wrote: With two representatives per district this is a pretty good method, if we want a two-party system and if we accept the idea of having representatives with different weights. Spoiler and gerrymandering related

Re: [EM] Interactive Representation

2011-11-06 Thread Juho Laatu
Yes. It would be a quite natural approach to first count the number of seats that each party gets based on the number of votes that they got, and then use the rankings and more complex counting methods within each party separately. That would have brought the high numbers of 35 and 405 down to

[EM] Interactive Representation

2011-11-04 Thread capologist
In this post I discuss a proportional representation system called Interactive Representation (IR). A brief description of the system is followed by a discussion of some characteristics compared to traditional systems such as single-representative districts (the dominant paradigm in the United