Re: [EM] Kevin: My failure scenario was erroneous for ABucklin

2012-03-03 Thread Kevin Venzke
Hi Jameson, De : Jameson Quinn >À : MIKE OSSIPOFF >Cc : election-meth...@electorama.com >Envoyé le : Vendredi 2 mars 2012 13h13 >Objet : Re: [EM] Kevin: My failure scenario was erroneous for ABucklin > > > >Also, since ABucklin is in all significant regards identic

Re: [EM] Kevin: My failure scenario was erroneous for ABucklin

2012-03-02 Thread Jameson Quinn
Also, since ABucklin is in all significant regards identical to MJ, Balinski and Laraki's proof that MJ meets FBC works verbatim for ABucklin. Jameson 2012/3/2 MIKE OSSIPOFF > Kevin: > > I've now realized that my FBC failure scenario works for > Stepwise-to-Majority, but not for ABucklin. > >

[EM] Kevin: My failure scenario was erroneous for ABucklin

2012-03-02 Thread MIKE OSSIPOFF
Kevin: I've now realized that my FBC failure scenario works for Stepwise-to-Majority, but not for ABucklin. So: False alarm. Sorry about that. I myself hadn't fully studied the failure scenario, which is why I didn't, at first, realize that the failure scenario doesn't work for ABucklin. Th