Kristofer:
On 04/27/2012 07:32 PM, Michael Ossipoff wrote:>* ...but wouldn't it be
better not to have the disadvantags?*
You replied:
Sure. It would be better to make Arrow and G&S go away, but it's not going
to happen.
[endquote]
Neither Arrow, Gibbard, not Sattterthwaite has ever said that a voti
On Apr 28, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Michael Ossipoff wrote:
For one thing, Condorcet discourages honesty, because, even if you
top-rank Compromise, top-ranking Favorite too can cause Compromise
to lose to Worse. when ranking Compromise _alone_ in 1st place
would have defeated Worse. To do
-boun...@lists.electorama.com
[mailto:election-methods-boun...@lists.electorama.com] On Behalf Of Dave
Ketchum
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 9:15 PM
To: Michael Ossipoff
Cc: election-meth...@electorama.com
Subject: Re: [EM] Kristofer: Approval vs Condorcet, 4/28/12
On Apr 28, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Michael Ossipoff
On 4/28/12 11:46 PM, Paul Kislanko wrote:
It fails when approval is used as vote counting method. In approval
COUNTING, if you voted Favorite above Compromise, you vote Favorite EQUAL
Compromise, and even though you don't like Compromise, you helped elect the
idiot.
i've been saying this for mon
As the subject indicates, the topic is Approval vs Condorcet.
To Mike O: How did we get here?
To RBJ: Thanks for clarifications.
On Apr 29, 2012, at 12:47 AM, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
...
On Apr 28, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Michael Ossipoff wrote:
For one thing, Condorcet discourages h
(Oops - seems that I clicked "Reply" instead of "Reply to All". Let's
try that again.)
---
It appears that your mail program has seriously mangled your reply,
bunching up all the text into a single block. In addition, it seems to
have sent multiple versions of your reply in the same message.
