Re: [EM] Re : Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?

2011-11-18 Thread Kevin Venzke
Jameson/Mike,   De : Jameson Quinn >>>À : Kevin Venzke >>>Cc : em >>>Envoyé le : Jeudi 17 Novembre 2011 12h48 >>>Objet : Re: [EM] Re : Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV >>>squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics? >>

Re: [EM] Re : Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?

2011-11-17 Thread Jameson Quinn
2011/11/17 Kevin Venzke > > ..In practice [preference-mentioning criteria] usually have to be > translated into votes-only criteria in order to figure out how to use or > test them. > Yes, this is another (better?) way of putting what I said about "Criteria which apply to ballots and mention pref

[EM] Re : Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. Divulge IRV election specifics?

2011-11-17 Thread Kevin Venzke
Hi Mike,   De : MIKE OSSIPOFF >>À : election-meth...@electorama.com >>Envoyé le : Mercredi 16 Novembre 2011 11h32 >>Objet : [EM] Votes-only criteria vs preference criteria. IRV squeeze-effect. >>Divulge IRV election specifics? >> I don't object to such criteria. I just prefer not to use them. I