Greg Nisbet wrote:
So far some nice ideas have been proposed for measuring how effective a
multiwinner method is.
All of the ones proposed are based on n, let n be a list of utility
scores for the candidates.
1. ln(2*sum(n)+a) we don't know what a is. It's probably pretty close to
a constant, l
small correction:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Greg Nisbet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> So far some nice ideas have been proposed for measuring how effective a
> multiwinner method is.
> All of the ones proposed are based on n, let n be a list of utility scores
> for the candidates.
> 1. ln(2*
So far some nice ideas have been proposed for measuring how effective a
multiwinner method is.
All of the ones proposed are based on n, let n be a list of utility scores
for the candidates.
1. ln(2*sum(n)+a) we don't know what a is. It's probably pretty close to a
constant, let's just call it 1.
2.
