[EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"

Hi Kristofer, Thank you very much for the thoughtful comments. Some replies follow. Kristofer wrote: ?Regarding most strategies being burial or compromising: I seem to recall that in your previous paper, that was the case for most methods, but not for Hare (IRV) and top-two runoff. For the sake

Re: [EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"

2011/2/19 Kristofer Munsterhjelm > Kevin Venzke wrote: > >> Hi Kristofer, >> >> --- En date de : Sam 19.2.11, Kristofer Munsterhjelm < >> km-el...@broadpark.no> a écrit : >> >>> Some other observations: it seems that adding a Smith >>> constraint (Smith, or Smith//) limits the vulnerability to >>

Re: [EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"

Hi Kristofer, --- En date de : Sam 19.2.11, Kristofer Munsterhjelm a écrit : > > Well actually it's LNHelp that gives you immunity to > burial. (DSC, QR, and > > MMPO are vulnerable in varying ways.) And sadly it > seems to me that the desirability of having other voters > doubt that you will ex

Re: [EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"

Kevin Venzke wrote: Hi Kristofer, --- En date de : Sam 19.2.11, Kristofer Munsterhjelm a écrit : Some other observations: it seems that adding a Smith constraint (Smith, or Smith//) limits the vulnerability to compromising, and that having the base method satisfy LNHarm greatly limits vulnera

Re: [EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"

Hi Kristofer, --- En date de : Sam 19.2.11, Kristofer Munsterhjelm a écrit : > Some other observations: it seems that adding a Smith > constraint (Smith, or Smith//) limits the vulnerability to > compromising, and that having the base method satisfy LNHarm > greatly limits vulnerability to buria

Re: [EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"

James Green-Armytage wrote: Dear Election Methods Fans, I've been working on a paper entitled "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections", which I'd like to submit to Voting Matters sometime in the near future, and I'd really appreciate your comments and feedback. Here

[EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"

Dear Election Methods Fans, I've been working on a paper entitled "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections", which I'd like to submit to Voting Matters sometime in the near future, and I'd really appreciate your comments and feedback. Here is a link to the current draft