--- On Thu, 11/6/09, Árpád Magosányi mag...@rabic.org wrote:
2009/6/10 Juho Laatu juho4...@yahoo.co.uk
I just want to agree with this
viewpoint. I have seen e.g. claims
that Condorcet (that can elect
compromise candidates) would favour
candidates that have no strong
opinions. But I
--- On Thu, 11/6/09, Kevin Venzke step...@yahoo.fr wrote:
In Schulze you foremost want to defeat every other
candidate head-to-head.
If we are even looking at beatpaths, all candidates have
failed their
first goal.
Yes, in Schulze and other Condorcet
methods the primary goal can be said
Hi!
The underlying assumption of Warren's analysis is that there are two major
candidates, and the voter tries to make one of these candidates win at any
cost.
I feel uneasy with this assumption, because
- here, now I would not entrust any of the top two candidates, and the
majority of the
Hello,
--- En date de : Mer 10.6.09, Árpád Magosányi mag...@rabic.org a écrit :
What I am missing here is analysis of the impact of voting
method on the strategy of voters and candidates.
I hope a model could be set up which helps to understand
this, but I have only faint ideas about how
