At 2:40 AM +0930 8/26/03, Chris Benham wrote:
On Sat.23-8-03 Eric Gorr wrote:
Why do you believe the middle preferences of a voter should matter
less then the highest or lowest preferences?
CB:I don't believe that (and never said I did). You may have
discovered an unintended effect. I admit that i
On Sat.23-8-03 Eric Gorr wrote:
Why do you believe the middle preferences of a voter should matter
less then the highest or lowest preferences?
CB:I don't believe that (and never said I did). You may have discovered an unintended effect. I admit that it is maybe a bit odd that the
Dear Mike Ossipoff,
you wrote (23 Aug 2003):
> Markus said:
> > The fact that the binary methods are all vulnerable to
> > preference misrepresentation of an equal difficulty is
> > not surprising as the winning criterion of these methods
> > is a binary one by definition. Hence all relevant
> > i
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 07:10:47PM -0400, John B. Hodges wrote:
> Some further comments. Most Condorcet-methods are "brute force"
> computationally. The first thing they do is do all possible pairwise
> comparisons. The multiseat method CPO-STV is likewise a "brute force"
> method; for an N-seat
