At 04:14 AM 10/30/2003, you wrote:
Sorry if I wasn't clear - I have no objection to using Condorcet to select
the winner - I applaud that and really like the voting interface. I am just
struggling with how to make the scalar values meaningful as intermediate
results.
And I am struggling with the
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:10:06 -0800
From: Rob Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EM] Displaying intermediate results in Condorcet-based
elections (re: Rob Brown's original question)
My original request was to suggest a way to produce a single scalar
score per candidate which
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:07:12 -0800
From: Rob Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EM] Displaying intermediate results in Condorcet-based
elections
You just don't want a lot of after-the-fact
questions like How could Sally have lost? She was 'ahead' by 30 points
yesterday
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:55:07 -0500
From: Dave Ketchum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EM] Displaying intermediate results in Condorcet-based
elections (re: Rob Brown's original question)
Someone mentioned Approval - I object for, while the math is easier to
implement, the voter must
