Gervase Lam wrote:
>
> > The 2x2x2 grid can of course be extended yet again to a 2x2x2x2 grid by
> > using two sheets of paper. The first sheet is for those who voted Yes
> > for candidate A while the other is for those who voted No for candidate
> > A. The top grid on each page is for those wh
Marking up a pairwise matrix seems a bit of work to me, even for a
single ballot. You might hold your thumb next to the first candidate on
the ballot, and tick off boxes in a matrix for each candidate that first
candidate beats. Next, move your thumb down one line on the ballot and
repeat the pr
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:37:09 + Gervase Lam wrote:
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:59:28 -0500
From: Dave Ketchum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [EM] Electronic Voting Bill of Rights?
It depends on whether you do Disk-At-Once or Track-At-Once recording.
If you do Disk-At-Once (i.e. write all the b
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:11:01 -0500
> From: Dave Ketchum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [EM] Electronic Voting Bill of Rights?
> CONDORCET: Choices here also:
> Count as in Plurality? Tempting, since a majority winner would
> end the task.
That's it! You've reminded me of a way t
> The 2x2x2 grid can of course be extended yet again to a 2x2x2x2 grid by
> using two sheets of paper. The first sheet is for those who voted Yes
> for candidate A while the other is for those who voted No for candidate
> A. The top grid on each page is for those who voted Yes for candidate B
> wh
At 11:32 PM + 11/17/03, Gervase Lam wrote:
as finding a good way to hand count Condorcet
makes my brain hurt!
Why?
Seems rather trivial to me.
Just take a subset of the ballots and hand compute a pairwise matrix
for each subset. Take each of these pairwise matrices and add them
together.
R
> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:59:28 -0500
> From: Dave Ketchum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [EM] Electronic Voting Bill of Rights?
> > It depends on whether you do Disk-At-Once or Track-At-Once recording.
> > If you do Disk-At-Once (i.e. write all the ballots in one go), then
> > what I said
> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:59:39 +0100
> From: David GLAUDE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [EM] Electronic Voting Bill of Rights?
> I would like to know wich one are possible to handle with manual
> counting on large scale.
I am sure there are lots that can be hand counted. It depends on ho
Greetings list, November 17, 2003
Jim Riley wrote: "Arguably, the first runners-up method serves as a
correction for a source of disproportionality under STV - the extra quota."
Donald: Yes, it could be argued that the entire proportionality of the
original elect
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:37:00 - James Gilmour wrote:
David GLAUDE asked:
Once again as this list is dedicated to advanced voting/counting
method.
I would like to know which one are possible to handle with manual
counting on large scale.
Manual sorting and counting works OK for STV-PR in pub
David GLAUDE asked:
Once again as this list is dedicated to advanced voting/counting method.
I would like to know which one are possible to handle with manual
counting on large scale.
Manual sorting and counting works OK for STV-PR in public elections. All electronic
voting
introduced for the
11 matches
Mail list logo
