Markus--
You said:
When Mike means Schwartz Sequential Dropping (aka Beatpath
Method) with "Condorcet's method"
I reply:
But I didn't say that that's all that I mean by Condorcet's method. There
are a number of good versions of Condorcet's method. Here are some of them:
Schwartz Sequntial Drop
Forest,
--- Forest Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : >
> If there were one more C and one more B, the list with replications would
> look like CCABB|BBDDD. This time there are the same number of B's
> on both sides of the halfway mark.
>
> I suggest that we go with Kevin's suggestio
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Rob LeGrand wrote:
>
> > What is the function of "last own vote?"
>
> Nothing important, really, but it's used to implement what I call strategy
> B (the Poll Assumption in section 7.4 of Approval Voting by Steven Brams)
> and strategy I (adjust your previous Approval strate
Kevin Venzke wrote:
>I would guess that any single-winner method which produces proportional results
>on the whole, is actually producing garbage results, if you focus on any
>particular
>district. Consider Random Ballot to see what I'm getting at.
Yes Random Ballot, randomly selecting a ballot p
Mike Ossipoff wrote (25 Nov 2003):
> An elected official is considering writing a bill to
> enact Condorcet's method. Condorcetists are needed to
> to answer questions at a Condorcet tutorial meeting,
> and possibly to testify at a hearing about Condorcet's
> method.
When Mike means Schwartz Seque
