On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Forest Simmons wrote:
>
> More to the point, if the sample of voters were more than ten thousand,
> then the probability of the voters in the sample being pivotal would be
> small enough that there would little incentive for them to study the
> issues carefully, given the ot
--__--__--
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:56:49 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [EM] Re: EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was my understanding that Arrow's theorum does apply to CR. A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 01:47:40 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Adam Tarr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #517 - 3 msgs
Ken Johnson wrote:
>...
>
>On the other hand, it may be that the optimum-rating function
