Dear election methods fans,
It seems to me like there might be room for a bit of clarification in the
language which we use to discuss strategy in voting methods.
I'd like to point out that there are at least two basic kinds of
strategic alterations which a voter can make to
There was an error the first time I sent the link to my new web page. I
enclosed the address in brackets, and one of those brackets became a part
of the link, causing a file not found error for some people. I will now
try to send them again.
Here is the address of the title page:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:03:18 -0800 (PST) Forest Simmons wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Dave Ketchum wrote:
Original Message
From: Bart Ingles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: EM List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EM] Argument for Approval Primaries
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:49:40 -0800
It
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Dave Ketchum wrote:
Original Message
From: Bart Ingles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: EM List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EM] Argument for Approval Primaries
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:49:40 -0800
It occurs to me that one place where ranked ballot methods are
Dave Ketchum wrote:
If a method is good enough to select a single winner in the general
election, then it must be good enough, and most logical choice, for use
in related primaries.
It does not follow. An general election is a method the government uses to
try to find a candidate who best
