From: Ernest Prabhakar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:12:01 -0700
...
... Is there any way other groups could
get access to summaries (e..g, the pairwise matrix) or scrubbed subset
of ballots, for research purposes.
Certainly precinct totals should be made available. We
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Chris Benham wrote:
Here is a simple example from Marcus Schulze:
2: ABC
3: BCA
4: CAB
Here's my version of HMR:
All have median rank 2:
A has 2 above, 3 below, and 4 at median rank, so for A, Q=(2-3)/4.
Similarly, for B, Q=(3-4)/2, and for C, Q=(4-2)/3, the only
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ken Johnson
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 4:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EM] Open Voting Consortium for e-voting?
From: Ernest Prabhakar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:12:01 -0700
...
Hallo,
unlike the ranked pairs method, the river method satisfies
Steve Eppley's independence from Pareto-dominated alternatives
(IPDA).
**
Clone independence might depend on how he handles
same-size majorities.
I guess with the random voter hierarchy also the
river method satisfies
