Here's my 36 ungrammatical words:
IRV:
Eliminate candidate that is prefered (excluding eliminated candidates) of
fewest voters. Repeat.
Approval:
Vote for any number of candidates. Candidate receiving most votes wins.
Condorcet (ignoring cycles):
Simulate all runoffs using ranked ballots. El
In a message dated 8/18/2004 4:31:04 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Derive
successive plurality eliminations from ranked ballots, eliminating one
candidate each round.
That's very good.
It doesn't say how candidates are eliminated, and it doesn't "describe" the
I'd be interested in a 12-word IRV explanation I don't think that's
possible, either.
Derive successive plurality eliminations from ranked ballots, eliminating
one candidate each round.
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
In a message dated 8/18/2004 2:17:22 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One
should simplify as much as possible but no further. Still, here
goes:Rank candidates and elect pairwise winner.Six words.
:)
Yes, but no explanation.
There are "Condorcet-based" methods tha
On Aug 18, 2004, at 11:52 AM, Eric Gorr wrote:
Anyone want to take a stab an giving an explanation of Condorcet
Voting in 12 words or less...?
I'm a sucker for terse phrasing:
Rank all candidates. Pick one most preferred over each of the others.
Twelve exactly!
Of course, the whole notion is a li
ooo...I like it.
Got rid of the extra word in Approval Voting as well...
Vote for one or more candidates. Candidate with the most votes wins.
At 12:06 PM -0700 8/18/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One should simplify as much as possible but no further. Still, here goes:
Rank candidates and elect pai
One should simplify as much as possible but no further. Still, here goes:
Rank candidates and elect pairwise winner.
Six words. :)
Mike Rouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Gorr wrote:
Anyone want to take a stab an giving an explanation of Condorcet
Voting in 12 words or less...?
Had a conversation recen
Anyone want to take a stab an giving an explanation of Condorcet
Voting in 12 words or less...?
Had a conversation recently with an IRV supporter who is supporting
IRV over Condorcet and Approval Voting because IRV can be explained
in 12 words or less (but has yet to provide that explanation) a
Never mind...the answer is obvious. If enough clones are running in
the same race, it is possible that they will all tie for least votes
and all be eliminated even though one of them would have won should
they have been eliminated one at a time.
At 11:16 AM -0400 8/18/04, Eric Gorr wrote:
I was
I was looking at the IRV page on wikipedia
(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Instant-runoff_voting)
and noticed in the tie-breaking rules that when one eliminates all of
the candidates at once who are tied for least votes that IRV would
then violate independence of clones.
Can anyone
10 matches
Mail list logo
