Dear Steve!
you wrote:
I'm not sure which strategy criteria Jobst credited me
with, but I suspect they're the ones for which I credit
Mike Ossipoff:
minimal defense, which is nearly the same as Mike's
strong defensive strategy criterion (SDSC).
non-drastic defense, which is
On Oct 15, 2004, at 7:24 AM, Eric Gorr wrote:
At 11:15 PM -0700 10/14/04, James Cooper wrote:
could you explain the details of how ER-IRV (whole and fractional) are
tabulated?
I have Equal Ranking IRV Whole Fractional implemented within my
voting calculator.
You should be able to discern how
Dear Jobst and Steve,
Please allow me to join your conversation.
Jobst, you wrote:
As to TRUNCATION RESISTANCE, I fear the proposal might FAIL that because
of the specific definition of defeat strength. With defeat strength =
winning votes, this criterion also follows from immunity, but
Dear election methods fans,
I suggest that ordinary winning votes methods (beatpath, ranked pairs,
river, etc.) fails Mike Ossipoff's strong defensive strategy criterion,
according to what I think is the most reasonable interpretation of that
criterion, whereas cardinal pairwise passes
