Hi Jan, thanks for your comments. Both of your objections center around the
"granularity issue" - in the first case, allowing voters to choose only one
delegate when they might like to support several; in the second case,
allowing voters to choose only "whole candidates" without being able to
Jan Kok a écrit :
> Bryan,
>
> I applaud you for thinking about, writing about, and promoting a mechanism
> that encourages grass-roots activism. However, I see a couple of problems
> with the indrep idea in its present form:
>
> 1. Why do you recommend allowing each voter to vote for only one c
Alex--
OK, so there are many different ways to generalize/extend/apply/whatever the
concept of Nash equilibrium to voting, and my preferred formalism is hardly
the only way to do it. I am no longer interested in the issue of who gave
what name to what.
I reply:
That was evident from the fact
Bryan,
I applaud you for thinking about, writing about, and promoting a mechanism
that encourages grass-roots activism. However, I see a couple of problems
with the indrep idea in its present form:
1. Why do you recommend allowing each voter to vote for only one candidate?
That's Plurality voti
