On Dec 17, 2004, at 3:35 PM, Forest Simmons wrote:
Forest wrote ...
Suppose that there are only three candidates, and you think that your
compromise C has a significantly better chance than your favorite F
of
winning against the candidate D that you dislike the most, and that
there is a good chan
I have a friend who gets daughter dressed for preschool every morning by
presenting her with exactly two complete outfits, and then telling her
to "choose". Apparently after making a choice, the girl is more likely
to accept getting dressed without a fight, and so far hasn't demanded a
third o
Eric Gorr wrote:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/instantrunoff-freewheeling/message/829
Some of the more "interesting" comments by James Salsman
"Because Condorcet voting can more easily be manipulated by strategic
voting (i.e., marking whichever of the top-two candidates you do not
want to win dead
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/instantrunoff-freewheeling/message/829
Some of the more "interesting" comments by James Salsman
"Because Condorcet voting can more easily be manipulated by strategic
voting (i.e., marking whichever of the top-two candidates you do not
want to win dead last after people
Forest,
--- Forest Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > I think I'd better note that I didn't come up with "Runoff Without
> > Elimination" as a name or idea... I recall old archive messages
> > where "RWE" was discussed by Mike Ossipoff and Donald Davison.
>
> But you did invent "Gradual
