When can I find all the articles that compare amendment and successive
procedures?
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:04:39 + MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote:
I wasn't going to disagree with anything Russ posted, because I didn't
want to seem to be picking on him, or argumentative. But, after a few of
his postings, I finally decided that any posting that says misleading
things can fairly and pr
Take a clock face and put labels A, B, and C at 12:00, 4:00, and 8:00,
respectively. At 2:00, 6:00, and 10:00 put the labels not(C), not(A), and
not(B), respectively.
Then on the intervals between the hour marks put the labels
A>>B>C (between 12:00 and 1:00),
A>B>>C (between 1:00 and 2:00)
I wasn't going to disagree with anything Russ posted, because I didn't
want to seem to be picking on him, or argumentative. But, after a few of his
postings, I finally decided that any posting that says misleading things can
fairly and properly be commented on.
Russ said:
Like plurality, IRV
I'm talking here about the Best Frontrunner (BF) versions that assume that
at least 1 of the 2 expected frontrunners will be in the tie or near-tie if
there is one.
But, first, referring to the BF version that doesn't make that assumption, I
used it to determine how to vote if some actual publ
