I wrote:
> "Clone-ness" thus can't be a binary factor that is either "on" or "off," > but a continuous function. I fear this isn't blunt enough, so let me restate:
The fundamental problem with a plain Borda count isn't clones per se, it's that it doesn't directly take into consideration how cand
This looks promising. I like this kind of creativity.
Three Questions:
1. Exactly how do you define correlation?
2. Do you re-calculate the correlations after each elimination?
3. What about clone triplets, quintuplets, etc.?
Forest
<>
Election-methods mailing list - see http://el
Forest--
You wrote:
I was discouraged when Markus and Steve pointed out to me that MMPO failed
Clone Winner,
I reply:
It seems to me that the way that MMPO or PC fails ICC, MMC, or GSFC, is not
a failure that will be likely or frequent.
Copeland fails ICC in a much more flagrant and prob