I see, said the idiot. Please ignore my previous post on this topic. I
was failing to comprehend the intricacies of the difference between
Bucklin and ER-Bucklin(whole), some of which are explained below by
Kevin Venzke.
Jim Faran
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 10:05, Kevin Venzke wrote:
> James,
>
> ---
James,
--- James Green-Armytage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Kevin, you wrote:
> >This seems like a new interpretation. I believe both this interpretation
> >and
> >ERB(fractional) satisfy monotonicity, since in neither method can raising
> >a candidate cause any other candidate to get their vo
It seems to me that ER-Bucklin(whole) does not satisfy FBC since Bucklin
does not.
Example: 3 candidates, 10 voters
Preferences:
2:A>B>C
1:A>C>B
3:C>A>B
4:B>C>A
1st round scores are 3:4:3 for A,B,C: No majority. 2nd round scores are
6:6:8. C has the largest majority and so wins.
What is a poor
