Kevin--
Yes, I prefer the ERBucklin(whole) that you described. I'd always assumed
that a candidate 2nd place would get a vote in the 2nd round. But I prefer
the verson that you described. How about this wording:
ERBucklin(whole):
Voters rank the candidates. Equal rankings and truncation are
Here's an interesting example with four candidates, in which (under Shulze) an
order reversal between Favorite and Compromise would give the win to Compromise
(instead of a third candidate D) even though Compromise already beats Favorite.
In other words, there seems to be incentive to betray Fa
Jobst,
--- Jobst Heitzig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Dear Kevin!
>
> You wrote:
> > SFC talks about situations with a *sincere* CW.
>
> I thought the example you gave was the sincere preferences. If not, what
> were the sincere preferences in that example and which was the sincere
> CW in t
Mike,
--- MIKE OSSIPOFF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> In ERBucklin(whole), if you raise Favorite from 2nd place up to 1st place
> where Compromise is, doesn't that mean that your vote filters down to your
> old 3rd place candidate sooner? Maybe soon enough to let him get a majority
> before F
