On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 21:30 -0500, Paul Kislanko wrote:
All of the gobblydegoog aside, to Rob - we don't care what you want, us
voters want to NOT have to rank all altertantives. I want to list only the
ones I find acceptable in the order I prefer them. Any method that
encourages me to rank
yahoogroups.com/group/condorcet
- Jan
On 10/8/05, MIKE OSSIPOFF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've unsuccessfully searched the web for that mailing list, and a way to
write to it or join it (in order to write to it). How can that be
accomplished?
Mike Ossipoff
Election-methods mailing list
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 00:07:55 -0700 Rob Lanphier wrote:
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 21:30 -0500, Paul Kislanko wrote:
All of the gobblydegoog aside, to Rob - we don't care what you want, us
voters want to NOT have to rank all altertantives. I want to list only the
ones I find acceptable in the order
] On Behalf Of Rob Lanphier Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 8:08 AM
Here's the problem with that philosophy. Let's say there are
three credible front-runners: mediocre, bad and worse.
I would hope many voters would like to be able to express
both that bad and worse are unacceptable, while
