I think a better phrase for it is valid concern. This issue to me is far more
critical than just about anything else related to elections. If you haven't
yet done some homework on this, it deserves it.
Eron
On Monday 08 December 2003 7:59 pm, Steve Barney wrote:
> Here's an interesting piece of
quired
> to validate the election is quite small, the validation process would be
> fairly simple and inexpensive.
In regards to your ideas of validation, I really have to think this over and
see how it would work. One thing I'm concerned about is the fact that ballots
can have 30+ &q
ation
cards...people just don't follow instructions properly. I think that is one
of my biggest reasons for supporting e-voting.
> So far nobody has come over and tried to bribe me or coerce me into voting
> one way or another.
>
> There is a statement about the penalty for elec
> of transparency, security and clear understanding on the effect of my
> vote on the potential result.
>
> Eron Lloyd wrote:
> >>In Belgium when paper voting, I have the right to draw a little house or
> >>a mickey mouse (without beeing affraid of Disney corporation for
&g
On Tuesday November 11 2003 7:08 pm, David GLAUDE wrote:
> Eron Lloyd wrote:
> > I agree there is quite an amount of value in this traditional method.
> > What I was proposing was to use an electronic interface to produce a
> > marked paper ballot. This way, you have the
Hi David,
On Tuesday November 11 2003 6:44 pm, David GLAUDE wrote:
> Eron Lloyd wrote:
> > An interesting idea for sure. I think computer ballots would be a great
> > way to produce an error-free paper tally,
>
> Why do you want error-free paper tally?
>
> In Belgium wh
ted ;)
Is the SAT still administered on paper? I though most are moving to
computer-based, with paper as an option. I know the GREs are.
> Alex
>
>
> ----
> Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by De
re or hijacking could occur. Relying on voters to audit their votes is
unacceptable, if people would treat the reciept like they do any other (ATM,
credit card, etc.). They just don't pay attention enough. You have to attempt
to engineer away risk factors first. That might just mean pen and p
nal workings of their machines.
>
> It looks like Bush won't need a boost from the supreme court this time
> around.
>
>
> Forest
>
> ----
> Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Vir
