Re: [EM] BeatpathWinner is SSD

2005-03-29 Thread Markus.Schulze
Dear Mike, I wrote (28 March 2005): > Suppose V is the number of voters. > > Suppose d[X,Y] is the number of voters who > strictly prefer candidate X to candidate Y. > > Suppose p(z)[X,Y] is the strength of the strongest > path from candidate X to candidate Y when the strength > of a pairwise defe

Re: [EM] Markus, criteria similiar to majority rule definition

2005-03-28 Thread Markus.Schulze
Dear Mike, I wrote (28 March 2005): > Suppose V is the number of voters. > > Suppose d[X,Y] is the number of voters who > strictly prefer candidate X to candidate Y. > > Suppose p(z)[X,Y] is the strength of the strongest > path from candidate X to candidate Y when the strength > of a pairwise defe

Re: [EM] James--CP, AERLO, ATLO, defensive strategy definiltion

2005-03-28 Thread Markus.Schulze
Dear Mike, you wrote (27 March 2005): > I told Markus that I was going to define majority > rule soon. My definition of majority wishes is > similar, and I guess that I'd better state that > definition now, instead of being vague about what > I mean by majority wishes and majority rule. > > If a m

Re: [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze

2005-03-27 Thread Markus.Schulze
Dear Kevin, you wrote (27 March 2005): > The simulation works this way: There are five randomly-sized > factions, which each rank a random number of the 4 candidates. > The first faction always first votes C>D, and then changes > their vote to C>D>A. When this causes C or D to lose, it's a > Later