There is an audio discussion, originally on BBC Radio
4 about a new book which deals with the perceived
problem of ignorance of economics among voters, and
whether this matters. There is a link at the end.
It is not really about methods of voting.
One of the speakers advocates the taking of
I am aware of the controversy surrounding
the 2004 U.S. Presidential election in Ohio
and elsewhere. I live in Spain and won't
comment on this more.
Highly reliable was meant to mean that
the result of the exit poll would nearly
always be quite close to the result of
a (correct) count of the
There's an interesting preprint by van Hees and
Dowding about manipulation (link below), in which they
argue that it sometimes could actually be beneficial.
They define 2 types of manipulation, so-called
sincere and transparent, which it is argued could
be beneficial, and among other things they
Does anyone know of a resource about Declared Strategy
Voting which is more up-to-date than Lorrie Cranor´s
dissertation (below)
http://lorrie.cranor.org/pubs/diss/
--
Thanks, Stephen
__
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo.
There seems to be a connection between the Gini
function discussed here recently and the Borda Count.
On all ballots, rankings are assumed complete and
strict.
Positional methods like the BC correspond bijectively
(apart from a scaling factor) to the lists of n
non-decreasing numbers of the form
Nice to see a discussion of welfare in this context.
Can we confirm that welfare is a synonym for
utility?
A starting model would be: given a voting system which
is sufficiently expressive (perhaps a range system),
assume that everyone just votes their welfare
directly, and see where that gets
Is anyone there willing to write an Electowiki page
(or
point us to an existing place) about the relationship
between voting and utility/welfare?
There seems to be nothing on the usual sites.
It would be useful to have a summary of
the evidence (for and against):
- the relevance of utility
- its
For anyone else in Madrid (Spain) there is a free
conference this week on Problems of Democracy.
There is no need to register, and it is free. All the
sessions are in English. It is not specifically about
voting methods, but no doubt they will come up. One
of the lecture titles mentions
I have two questions about unanimity, which could be
expressed thus: if all the ballots are identical a
copy of that ballot should be the result, perhaps with
a need to pick the top candidate(s) off it, or to
break a tie, afterwards.
First, is there any seriously-proposed deterministic
method
This is an interesting worldwide survey carried out by
the BBC and Gallup about:
(i) is your country governed by the will of the
people?
(ii) are your elections free and fair?
About 65% of people answer No to the first.
There have been significant falls in the Yes answers
to both questions in
This example shows something which seems undesirable,
though is probably rare. It works both with ranked
pairs and beatpath.
Two slightly different sets of ballots give very
different social orderings: a change in the pairwise
X-Y preference on a couple of ballots also changes
unrelated
This is a bit peripheral, but might be of interest.
Especially, those of you in the USA might like to look
at this site, dedicated to the exposure of flaws in
voting machines. These machines are actually in use.
www.blackboxvoting.org
Mostly, but not only about Diebold. I wonder how
these
According to recent issues of The Independent
(serious London daily paper), there is now momentum
building for voting reform for the House of Commons
(first-past-the-post, single-member constituency at
the moment).
Of course this follows the recent election there.
There are a number of articles
that we do not allow paths through eliminated
candidates? Thanks.
--
Stephen Turner.
__
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!: ¡100 MB GRATIS!
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es
Election-methods mailing list - see http
14 matches
Mail list logo