Hi Chris, James A-G and everybody else
The example:
300 votes
3 seats
Droop quota = 75
74: A, B, C, D, E
39: B, A, C, D, E
75: C
39: D, E, C, B, A
73: E, D, C, B, A
seems to be attracting a lot of comment from various people.
Under Newland-Britton counting A,C,D or B,C,E are elected depen
James G-A,
Further on the subject of my proposal to modify STV-PR by , after
transfering supluses, eliminating the Condorcet loser among those votes
and fractions of votes not tied up in quotas: I am afraid I have
discovered that this method fails FBC (Favourite Betrayal Criterion).
To demonst
James G-A,
In response to my proposal to modify STV-PR by instead of IRV-style
plurality elimination ,eliminating the Condorcet loser among the ballots
and fractions of ballots not tied up in quotas, you wrote:
"Modified example:
300 votes
3 seats
Droop quota = 75
74: A, B, C, D, E
39: B, A,
