Forest,
--- "Simmons, Forest " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Dear James,
>
> as I said in a recent message, I also think that AWP is more resistant to
> burying than DMC. But
> until there is a simpler description of AWP, I will support DMC over AWP in
> the category of
> "Condorcet Public
Dear James,
as I said in a recent message, I also think that AWP is more resistant to
burying than DMC. But until there is a simpler description of AWP, I will
support DMC over AWP in the category of "Condorcet Public Proposals."
This brings up a question. How good is MinMax(Approval Agains
James,
Here is an example of yours that we've been
discussing.
Preferences
26: A>>C>B
22: A>>B>C
19: C>B>>A
06: C>>B>A
22: B>C>>A
05: B>>A>C
Direction of defeats
A>C 52-48
C>B 51-49
B>A 52-48
Approvals: A48, B46, C47.
A is the only candidate that is not pairwise beaten by
a more approved cand
Chris,
Your DMC>AWP argument, while simple (in my opinion, overly simplistic),
is quite abstract. I offer you an AWP>DMC argument that is somewhat more
concrete, i.e. more tied to particular election scenarios.
Brief statement of argument:
Let's say that the electorate is heav
