Re: [EM] Alternative SFC wording

2005-10-06 Thread Rob Lanphier
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 14:41 -0500, Ken Kuhlman wrote: > I still have a hard time seeing the value of this criterion. > > A profile is a profile. It doesn't matter if the reason for the votes > was honest, strategic, or if the voter's mothers told them what to do. > Once the votes are cast, a

Re: [EM] Alternative SFC wording

2005-10-06 Thread Ken Kuhlman
I still have a hard time seeing the value of this criterion. A profile is a profile. It doesn't matter if the reason for the votes was honest, strategic, or if the voter's mothers told them what to do. Once the votes are cast, a criterion helps determine who can & cannot reasonable win. So bot

[EM] Alternative SFC wording

2005-10-05 Thread MIKE OSSIPOFF
For SFC-complying methods, if falsification doesn't occur on a results-changing scale: Any sincere-voting majority is guaranteed that no one whom they all like less than the CW will win. [end of alternative SFC definition] For more simplicity I like to say "if no one falsifies a preferenc