Gervase,
--- Gervase Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Some people argue that (Plurality) PR can cause too much diversity. This
> can be detrimental when the elected chamber try to vote on things. This
> is the reason why Italy went from proportional to a single seats election.
I'm afrai
> From: "James Gilmour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [EM] Approval Strategy A- Question for Rob LeGrand
> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 09:34:05 -
> I am surprised that Borda should receive any serious consideration at
> all. The defects of this voting syst
Gervase wrote (in parts):
> Some people argue that (Plurality) PR can cause too much
> diversity.
What is "Plurality PR"? I thought Plurality could give acceptable PR only by chance.
Certainly the
results of UK Plurality (single-seat and multi-seat) elections at all levels of
government show
> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 01:21:16 +0100 (CET)
> From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [EM] Approval Strategy A- Question for Rob LeGrand
> My thoughts:
> Plurality will be the most proportional because it can occasionally
> elect a fluk
David,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > Hello Rob and List
>
> Recently I've been trying to develop a spreadsheet model to investigate the
> effect of the use of different voting systems ( Plurality, IRV, Borda,
> Condorcet and Approval) on the results of elections to a multi-member assembly
Hello Rob and List
Recently I've been trying to develop a spreadsheet model to investigate the effect of the use of different voting systems ( Plurality, IRV, Borda, Condorcet and Approval) on the results of elections to a multi-member assembly elected in single districts.
I wanted to use in my
