James,
--- James Gilmour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Markus Schulze Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 12:10 PM
> > I have made the experience that the members of Wikipedia's
> > "Arbitration Committee" (ArbCom) work rather independently
> > and that the one ArbCom member is rarely willing to rev
Rob Lanphier Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 9:46 AM
> As you saw earlier, some people on Wikipedia are considering
> a switch to Bloc voting (plurality-at-large) for a multi-seat
> election, away from Approval.
Whatever the merits or de-merits of multi-seat Approval, I am sure Bloc Voting
(multi
Markus Schulze Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 12:10 PM
> I have made the experience that the members of Wikipedia's
> "Arbitration Committee" (ArbCom) work rather independently
> and that the one ArbCom member is rarely willing to revert
> the decision of the other ArbCom member.
>
> Therefore,
Dear Rob Lanphier,
I have made the experience that the members of Wikipedia's
"Arbitration Committee" (ArbCom) work rather independently
and that the one ArbCom member is rarely willing to revert
the decision of the other ArbCom member.
Therefore, I suggest that the ArbCom should be elected by
a
Hi folks,
As you saw earlier, some people on Wikipedia are considering a switch to
Bloc voting (plurality-at-large) for a multi-seat election, away from
Approval.
I had always thought Approval made the most sense here, but I'm starting
to see the wisdom of the criticism. With a very large field,
