Kevin,
I see from your response to the Electowiki Method support poll that
you nearly support the ER-Bucklin(whole) single-winner method,
and that for Legislative election methods you like possibly a
proportional approval scheme.
What do you think of this PR version of
Mike,
--- MIKE OSSIPOFF [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
In ERBucklin(whole), if you raise Favorite from 2nd place up to 1st place
where Compromise is, doesn't that mean that your vote filters down to your
old 3rd place candidate sooner? Maybe soon enough to let him get a majority
before
Sure, I'd have to agree that ERBucklin(whole), matching SR in its FBC
compliance, is better than SR, which, so far as I know, offers nothing but
FBC.
But MDDA is better than Bucklin.
Bucklin has the advantage of a easier handcount than the pairwise-count
methods, for organizations or
Markus quoted the Minnesota Supreme Court:
the Minnesota Supreme Court wrote:
The preferential system [Bucklin] directly diminishes the right of an
elector to give an effective vote for the candidate of his choice.
I reply:
That's odd, because if the voter votes only for his favorite, then he's
Mike Ossipoff wrote:
By the way, if anyone knows of an example in which Buckling fails
Independence from Clones, would they post it?
20:ABC
17:BCA
13:CAB
B wins under (usual) Bucklin.
20:DABC
17:BCAD
13:CADB
Now A wins, so adding a clone of A (D, which doesn't win) caused B to lose.
=
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Rob LeGrand wrote:
Here's a question I thought about quite a bit a while ago but never posted
until now that there's talk of Bucklin on the list: Which candidate should
win the following Bucklin election?
25:BrownJonesDavisSmith
26:DavisSmithBrownJones
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Forest Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Rob LeGrand wrote:
Here's a question I thought about quite a bit a while ago but never posted
until now that there's talk of Bucklin on the list: Which candidate should
win the following Bucklin election?
Here's a question I thought about quite a bit a while ago but never posted
until now that there's talk of Bucklin on the list: Which candidate should
win the following Bucklin election?
25:BrownJonesDavisSmith
26:DavisSmithBrownJones
49:JonesSmithBrownDavis
Smith? Jones?
=
Rob
Rob LeGrand said:
Here's a question I thought about quite a bit a while ago but never
posted until now that there's talk of Bucklin on the list: Which
candidate should win the following Bucklin election?
25:BrownJonesDavisSmith
26:DavisSmithBrownJones
49:JonesSmithBrownDavis
Well, since
Rob,
--- Rob LeGrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Here's a question I thought about quite a bit a while ago but never posted
until now that there's talk of Bucklin on the list: Which candidate should
win the following Bucklin election?
25:BrownJonesDavisSmith
26:DavisSmithBrownJones
10 matches
Mail list logo