Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Forest Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding
Here's the simplest idea along these lines that seems promising to me.
Well. The idea is easier to explain than Max Power Cardinal Ratings
Here's the simplest idea along these lines that seems promising to me.
I'm more excited about it than I have been any of my other ideas in the
last few weeks:
Each voter votes a CR ballot on which one of the candidates is the virtual
Borderline Acceptable Candidate (BAC).
On each ballot BAC's
Forest,
--- Forest Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Suppose you were given a set of voted CR ballots, perhaps with
supplemental information such as a tentative approval cutoff. What rule
would you use to adjust the approval cutoff by taking into account the
popularity of the various
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] Kevin Venzke wrote:
... [skipping past many great insights to this proposal] ...
When there are cycles, I think there's necessarily a game of chicken going
on among the voters. I think an approval measurement is the best way to
resolve the game, forcing
Suppose you were given a set of voted CR ballots, perhaps with
supplemental information such as a tentative approval cutoff. What rule
would you use to adjust the approval cutoff by taking into account the
popularity of the various candidates as manifested by the ballots
themselves, as opposed to
