Re: [EM] Clock Methods

2005-02-15 Thread Forest Simmons
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:46:38 + From: Gervase Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> A . A>C>B . .[4] A>B>C Not(B) . . Not(C) C>A>B [2].. B>A>C C . . B C>B>A . .[3] B>C>A .

Re: [EM] Clock Methods

2005-02-14 Thread Gervase Lam
> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:23:08 -0800 (PST) > From: Forest Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [EM] Clock Methods > Thanks for taking time to explore. And nice text graphics for the > clock! I think I spent a bit too long calculating how to draw the text graphics...

Re: [EM] Clock Methods

2005-02-01 Thread Forest Simmons
that's why I didn't suggest using the center of gravity approach. And yes, it does generalize naturally to higher dimensional spheres. But, because of "sprucing up" I am mostly interested in the three candidate case. My Best, Forest From: Gervase Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: [EM] Clock Methods (for Three Candidates)

2005-01-31 Thread Gervase Lam
> Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:37:12 -0800 (PST) > From: Forest Simmons > Subject: [EM] Clock Methods (for Three Candidates) > Take a clock face and put labels A, B, and C at 12:00, 4:00, and 8:00, > respectively. At 2:00, 6:00, and 10:00 put the labels not(C), not(A), > and no

[EM] Clock Methods (for Three Candidates)

2005-01-22 Thread Forest Simmons
Take a clock face and put labels A, B, and C at 12:00, 4:00, and 8:00, respectively. At 2:00, 6:00, and 10:00 put the labels not(C), not(A), and not(B), respectively. Then on the intervals between the hour marks put the labels A>>B>C (between 12:00 and 1:00), A>B>>C (between 1:00 and 2:00)