> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 04:49:45 +0100 (CET)
> From: Kevin Venzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [EM] Defection, nomination disincentive, MMPO
> Also, every example I've seen of MMPO's Majority failure involves
> the use of four slots. It's always this s
Gervase,
Thanks for your reply.
--- Gervase Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > In "MinMax (Pairwise Opposition)" or "MMPO," a pairwise matrix
> > This method has flaws: It fails Condorcet,
>
> I initially thought MMPO did fail Condorcet. However, I thought I worked
> out why it did not.
> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 02:18:25 +0100 (CET)
> From: Kevin Venzke
> Subject: [EM] Defection, nomination disincentive, MMPO
> In "MinMax (Pairwise Opposition)" or "MMPO," a pairwise matrix
> is formed as in a Condorcet method, but the winners of pairwise
>
Hello,
Consider these sincere preferences:
49 A>B=C
2? B>C>A
2? C>B>A
100 total
The supporters of B and C, 51% of the voters, agree that A is
the worst candidate. But ensuring that the B and C voters can
cooperate may be difficult, since B supporters want B to win
if possible, and the same is tru
Hello,
Consider these sincere preferences:
49 A>B=C
2? B>C>A
2? C>B>A
100 total
The supporters of B and C, 51% of the voters, agree that A is
the worst candidate. But ensuring that the B and C voters can
cooperate may be difficult, since B supporters want B to win
if possible, and the same is tru
