Since its my pet method, I made a slideshow explaining Instant Runoff
Normalized Ratings.
PDF (219KB)
http://bolson.org/voting/IRNR_explaination.pdf
QuickTime (2.3MB)
http://bolson.org/voting/IRNR_explaination.mov
Brian Olson
http://bolson.org/
Election-methods mailing list - see http://elec
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Curt Siffert wrote:
> Brian - it sounds like zero is meaningless in IRNR, correct?
On the "like ... dislike" scale of ratings, 0.0 is "no opinion".
> If you
> normalized between 1 and 0 rather than 1 and -1, the results would be
> identical?
I'm not sure of that, but I thin
Brian - it sounds like zero is meaningless in IRNR, correct? If you
normalized between 1 and 0 rather than 1 and -1, the results would be
identical? Or, if I vote 0, -0.25, -0.5, -1; that's the same as if I
vote 1, 0.5, 0, -1. Even though the first time I'm basically saying
"none of the abov
On Mon, 17 May 2004, MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote:
> Brian Olson--
>
> You probably have written a better method than IRV.
>
> You wrote:
>
> Instant Runoff Normalized Ratings
> (IRNR)
>
> Every voter casts a rating of each choice on a scale of -1.0 to 1.0 or
> some equivalent scale. Each voter's voting po
Brian Olson--
You probably have written a better method than IRV.
You wrote:
Instant Runoff Normalized Ratings
(IRNR)
Every voter casts a rating of each choice on a scale of -1.0 to 1.0 or
some equivalent scale. Each voter's voting power is normalized, each
rating is divided by the sum of the absol
