Chris,
--- Chris Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>> "David's method gives me a similar, simpler idea that would seem to be an
>> improvement over IRV. The method would be:
>>
>> 1. The voters rank the candidates they would be willing to support, and also
>> place an approval cutoff. (Alt
Kevin,
On Monday, Sep.1, 2003 you wrote:
"David's method gives me a similar, simpler idea that would seem to be an
improvement over IRV. The method would be:
1. The voters rank the candidates they would be willing to support, and also
place an approval cutoff. (Alternatively, all candidates rank
David,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Kevin Venzke wrote:
>
> >David's method gives me a similar, simpler idea that would seem to be an
> >improvement over IRV. The method would be:
>
> >1. The voters rank the candidates they would be willing to support, and also
> >place an approval cutoff
Kevin Venzke wrote:
>David's method gives me a similar, simpler idea that would seem to be an
>improvement over IRV. The method would be:
>1. The voters rank the candidates they would be willing to support, and also
>place an approval cutoff. (Alternatively, all candidates ranked non-last
>could
David's method gives me a similar, simpler idea that would seem to be an
improvement over IRV. The method would be:
1. The voters rank the candidates they would be willing to support, and also
place an approval cutoff. (Alternatively, all candidates ranked non-last
could be considered "approved
