Mike,
--- MIKE OSSIPOFF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You replied:
That would be missing the point. If WDSC makes a meaningful guarantee, there
shouldn't be a silly, meaningless way of satisfying it.
I reply:
WDSC doesn't make a guarantee, meaningful or otherwise. Methods that comply
with
Kevin--
You quoted me:
So, a method would satisfy WDSC if the CADEBFG voters, comprising a
majority, could deny B the win by voting C=AD=EB=FG. It isn't necessary
that there be any other way for them to deny B the win.
I replied:
You got it. One is all it takes.
You'd continued:
I think that's
